I have a question or two ![Image]()
Can you give us a more accurate picture of uTest's testers?
What is the executive status of uTest?
And lastly,
It seems to me that uTest is changing it's strategy. Initially uTest's Unique Activity (see here) was in-the-wild testing. uTest provided real-world users from around the globe. The differentiation (in my mind at least) was we provided people that were real users first, and testers second.
Recently, it seems that the there is a shift to add more enterprise level services. Professional testers (or at least professional results) is is now more of a focus than accurate user representation. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, I'm just wondering if uTest is risking loosing it's unique position by becoming another tester outsourcing company rather than a real-world simulation service.
I guess I don't really have a question, it's more of an observation that I'd like to hear your thoughts on.
Can you give us a more accurate picture of uTest's testers?
- How many of the 80,000+ testers are active (worked on a uTest project in the last 3 months)?
- What is distribution between countries?
- How many Functional testers are in each rating level (Gold/Silver/Bronze)?
- What is the highest Functional rating score? Is there really someone out there with 100.000%?
What is the executive status of uTest?
- Is uTest profitable?
- How much effort is going into winning enterprise level customers compared to small and medium size customers
- How much is uTest expecting to grow this year (revenue, customers, uTest employees, testers, etc)
And lastly,
It seems to me that uTest is changing it's strategy. Initially uTest's Unique Activity (see here) was in-the-wild testing. uTest provided real-world users from around the globe. The differentiation (in my mind at least) was we provided people that were real users first, and testers second.
Recently, it seems that the there is a shift to add more enterprise level services. Professional testers (or at least professional results) is is now more of a focus than accurate user representation. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, I'm just wondering if uTest is risking loosing it's unique position by becoming another tester outsourcing company rather than a real-world simulation service.
I guess I don't really have a question, it's more of an observation that I'd like to hear your thoughts on.